NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Woodbridge v R [2010] NSWCCA 185
HEARING DATE(S): 11 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Hulme J at 3; Davies J at 54
DECISION: (1) Appellant's appeal against conviction dismissed. (2) Crown's appeal against sentence upheld. (3) Quash the sentences imposed by Walmsley DCJ. (4) In lieu (i) For the offence of manslaughter – imprisonment for 7 years including a non-parole period of 4 years, both such periods commencing on 27 November 2011; and (ii) For the offence of aggravated dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm - imprisonment for a fixed term of 3 years commencing on 27 November 2009.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal and new trial - appeal against conviction - manslaughter by driving - driving whilst intoxicated causing grievous bodily harm - defence of automatism - whether sane or insane automatism - Judge not permitting sane automatism to be left to the jury - whether Accused had adduced evidence sufficient to be left to the jury - whether Accused had a "disease of the mind" - no evidence of sane automatism. CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - crown appeal - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - hierarchy of offences involving death or serious injury by a motor vehicle - significance of blood alcohol level and distance driven before accident - sentence manifestly inadequate.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Einfield v R [2010] NSWCCA 87 Falconer V The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 30 Gonzalez v R [2006] NSWCCA 4 M'Naghten's case (1843) 10 Cl & Fin 200; 8 ER 718 R v Amurao [2005] NSWCCA 32 R v Black (unreported, NSWCCA, 23 July 1998) R v Blacklidge (unreported, NSWCCA, 12 December 1995) R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 R v Boyle [2009] VSCA 289 R v Cameron [2005] NSWCCA 359; (2005) 157 A Crim R 70 R v Cousins [2002] NSWCCA 81; (2002) 36 MVR 262 R v Clarke (1995) 78 A Crim R 226 R v Cramp [1999] NSWCCA 324; (1999) 110 A Crim R 198 R v Crump (unreported, NSWCCA, 30 May 1994) R v Do [2000] NSWCCA 459 R v Dunlop [2001] NSWCCA 435 R v Forbes (2005) 160 A Crim R 1 CASES CITED : R v Gordon (1994) 71 A Crim R 459 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Kalanj (1997) 98 A Crim R 505 R v McKinney [2005] NSWCCA 51; (1999) 29 MVR 355 R v Musumeci (unreported, NSWCCA, 30 October 1997) R v Porter (1933) 55 CLR 182 R v Rayner [2002] NSWCCA 309 R v Reeves [1999] NSWCCA 269; (1999) 29 MVR 451 R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 R v Ryan [2003] NSWCCA 202; (2003) 39 MVR 395 R v Sen [1999] NSWCCA 199 R v Tadman [2001] NSWCCA 225; (2001) 34 MVR 54 R v Youssef (1990) 50 A Crim R 1 R v Vukic [2003] NSWCCA 13; (2003) 38 MVR 475 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252 R v Woodward [2001] NSWCCA 90; (2002) 33 MVR 536 Radford v The Queen (1985) 42 SASR 266 SBF v R [2009] NSWCCA 231 Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate