NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Nguyen v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 283
HEARING DATE(S): 13 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 November 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Howie J at 2; Hislop J at 3
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - drug cultivation - sentence not manifestly excessive
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Electricity Supply Act 1995
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Bui v R [2008] NSWCCA 314 Des Rosiers v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 16; 159 A Crim R 549 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 R v AD [2005] NSWCCA 208 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434; (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 CASES CITED : R v Bloomfield (1998) 44 NSWLR 734 R v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 R v Knight; R v Biuvanua [2007] NSWCCA 283; 176 A Crim R 338 R v Morgan [1993] 70 A Crim R 368 Thi Lan Nguyen v R [2009] NSWCCA 181 Truong v R [2009] NSWCCA 41 Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584
PARTIES: Dinh Hao NGUYEN (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/6167
COUNSEL: M Dennis (Applicant) J Girdham (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Ly Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/6167
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate