NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Ma v R [2010] NSWCCA 320 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 5 November 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Schmidt J at 2; Howie AJ at 67
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - leave to appeal sentence - whether discount given for assistance was too low compared with discount allowed for co-offender - whether there was an error in the assessment of discount to which the applicant was entitled for her assistance - no error established - whether sentence is manifestly excessive - not established - leave to appeal granted - appeal dismissed
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6; (2002) 209 CLR 339 Chan, Lo and Nguyen v R [2010] NSWCCA 153 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Lowndes v R [1999] HCA 29; (1999) 195 CLR 665 R v El Hani [2004] NSWCCA 162 CASES CITED : R v Louis Sukkar [2005] NSWCCA 55 at [52] and Alchikh v The Queen [2007] R v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92; 172 A Crim R 151 R v Z [2006] NSWCCA 342; (2006) 167 Crim R 436 NSWCCA 345 SZ v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 19; (2007) 168 A Crim 249 Tyler v The Queen; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247; 173 A Crim R 458 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate