NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Quintano v B W Rose Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 955
HEARING DATE(S) : 21 July 08 JURISDICTION : Common Law Division Professional Negligence List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 21 July 2008
DECISION : Affidavit admitted as PX02.
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE – hearsay – where deponent of affidavit not available for cross examination – whether admission of affidavit should be excluded as being unfairly prejudicial pursuant to Evidence Act 1995, s 135.
LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Evidence Act 1995, ss 63, 67, 135
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Commonwealth v McLean (1996) 41 NSWLR 389 Ordukaya v Hicks [2000] NSWCA 180 CASES CITED : Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v Clark [2001] NSWCCA 494; (2001) 123 A Crim R 506 R v Souteski [2002] NSWCCA 509; (2002) 56 NSWLR 182 Young v Coupe [2004] NSWSC 546
Luke Quintano (plaintiff) PARTIES : BW Rose Pty Ltd (first defendant) AWS Security Services Pty Ltd (second defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20130/04
COUNSEL : Mr H J Marshall SC w Mr D J Hooke (plaintiff) Mr S G Campbell SC w Mr A B Parker (second defendant)
SOLICITORS : Beilby Poulden Costello (plaintiff) Curwood & Partners (second defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE LIST
BRERETON J
Monday, 21 July 2008
20130/04 Luke Quintano v B W Rose Pty Ltd & 2 Ors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate