NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave dismissed with costs by the High Court, 3 November 2009 s99/2009
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Sangha v Baxter [2009] NSWCA 78
HEARING DATE(S): 2 March 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1; Basten JA at 131; Handley AJA at 161
(a) Grant leave to appeal to the applicant from the decision of Judge McLoughlin of 29 May 2008; (b) Dismiss the respondent's summons seeking leave to cross-appeal; (c) Appeal allowed; DECISION: (d) The judgment of Judge McLoughlin of 29 May 2008 be set aside; (e) The proceedings be remitted to the Common Law Division of the Supreme Court for retrial on all issues and that the retrial be expedited; (f) The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the summons for leave to appeal and the appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951, if other otherwise qualified; (g) No order for costs with respect to the respondent's summons seeking leave to cross-appeal; (h) The costs of the trials before Judge Garling and Judge McLoughlin be determined by the trial judge at the remitted trial.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL – appeal – general principles – interference with Judge's findings of fact – functions of appellate court – findings on issue of negligence – where findings based on credibility of witnesses – where findings clearly wrong – particular cases – whether acts causing injury were carried out in self defence – whether contributory negligence established – whether injury occurred following commission of a serious offence by injured party – power to transfer proceedings in the District Court on a claim for damages to the Common Law Division of the Supreme Court – whether the case involves complex legal issues or issues of general public importance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate