NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: KATION PTY LTD v LAMRU PTY LTD; LEWIS v NORTEX PTY LTD (In liq) [NO 4] [2010] NSWCA 102
HEARING DATE(S): On the papers
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 May 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Hodgson JA at 1; Basten JA at 1
DECISION: (1) Direct that orders (6) and (11) be entered forthwith. (2) No order as to the costs associated with the further submissions filed pursuant to order (3) made on 21 December 2009.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS – appeal – apportionment of costs – proportionate responsibility for overall costs - COSTS – costs incurred by liquidator of unit trust – liability of party supporting an unsuccessful party – joint responsibility
CATEGORY: Consequential orders
CASES CITED: Kation Pty Ltd v Lamru Pty Ltd; Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In liq) [2009] NSWCA 145 Kation Pty Ltd v Lamru Pty Ltd; Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In liq) (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 428
Matter No. 40366/06: Kation Pty Ltd (Appellant and First Cross-respondent) Peter Lawrence Lewis (Second Appellant and Second Cross-respondent) Lamru Pty Ltd (First Respondent and First Cross-appellant) PARTIES: Russell William Lamb (Second Respondent and Second Cross-appellant) Nortex Pty Ltd (In liq) (Third Respondent and Third Cross-Respondent) Brian Raymond Silvia (Fourth Cross-respondent) Matter No. 40523/06: Peter Lawrence Lewis (Applicant) Nortex Pty Ltd (In liq) (Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40366/06; 40523/06
J Baird (Kation, Peter Lawrence Lewis) COUNSEL: S J Motbey (Lamru, Russell William Lamb) V R Gray (Nortex, Brian Raymond Silvia)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate