NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Cooper v R [2009] NSWCCA 57 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 3 February 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 March 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Blanch J at 89; Johnson J at 90
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - Sentence - Bribery and false statements - Complex arrangements to acquire unjustified or accelerated payment - No error by sentencing judge in assessment of sentence for individual offences - Submissions of lack of parity and consistency rejected
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Cameron v The Queen (2002) 209 CLR 339 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Pearce v The Queen (1989) 194 CLR 610 CASES CITED : Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Martin [2005] NSWCCA 190 R v Rivkin [2004] NSWCCA 7 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383
PARTIES: Bradley David COOPER - Applicant REGINA - Respondent/Crown
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/4688
COUNSEL: B Walker SC with G Bashir - Applicant W Abraham QC with B Neild - Respondent/Crown
SOLICITORS: Uther Webster & Evans - Applicant Commonwealth DPP - Respondent/Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate