NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Specialty Fashion Group Limited v Muirhead Nominees Pty Ltd & ors [2009] NSWSC 515
HEARING DATE(S) : 9 June 2009 JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 9 June 2009
DECISION : Application to set aside orders dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Setting aside orders - disclosure order provided for protection against self incrimination in terms of s 87 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 - s 87 no longer applies if s 128A of the Evidence Act 1995 applies - whether order irregular and should be set aside - whether portion of order should be treated as struck out with s 128A then applying of its own motion
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 Evidence Act 1995
Specialty Fashion Group Limited (Plaintiff) Simon Feldman (Second Defendant) Beautree Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) PARTIES : Richard Bamford (Fourth Defendant) A.E.M. Holdings Pty Ltd (Eighth Defendant) Patricia Yonon (also known as Patricia Bamford) (Ninth Defendant) Stephen Morris Marks (Eleventh Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2765/09
COUNSEL : R Beech-Jones SC and M Friedgut (Plaintiff) P Bruckner (Third, Fourth, Eighth and Ninth Defendants)
Arnold Bloch Liebler (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Whitehead Cooper Williams (Third, Fourth, Eighth and Ninth Defendants) Holding Redlich Solicitors (Eleventh Defendant) Milne Berry Berger & Freedman Solicitors (Second Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate