NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Wende v Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 550
HEARING DATE(S) : 29/10/08, 30/10/08, 12/12/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 June 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Hislop J at 1
DECISION : 1.The further amended summons is dismissed. 2.The plaintiffs are to pay the defendant's costs.
CATCHWORDS : LOCAL COURT - appeal - contract - terms and parties - costs - application of Local Court Practice Note 2
LEGISLATION CITED : Local Courts Act 1982 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Commonwealth of Australia v Griffiths [2007] NSWCA 370; 70 NSWLR 268 CASES CITED : Fabre v Arenales (1992) 27 NSWLR 437 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Sherborne Estate (No 2), Re; Vanvalen v Neaves [2005] NSWSC 1003; 65 NSWLR 268
TEXTS CITED : Cross on Evidence, 7th Aust ed (2004)
Herbert Wende (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Margaret Wende (Second Plaintiff) Mark Lloyd (Third Plaintiff) Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 13015/07
P Bates on 29 and 30 October 2008 (Plaintiffs); COUNSEL : C M Lawrence on 12 December 2008 (Plaintiffs) S Hughes (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : McKell's Solicitors (Plaintiffs) Heidtman & Co Lawyers (Defendant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Local Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 83850/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate