NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 75 NSWLR 619
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : April Fine Paper v Moore Business Systems [2009] NSWSC 867 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 14/08/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 August 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : White J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 17 August 2009
DECISION : Refer to paras 33, 35 and 36 of judgment.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – costs – application for security for costs – relevance of proportionality – proper approach to preparing commercial litigation – early involvement of counsel to reduce costs considered
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Legal Professional Act 2004 (NSW)
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Mondel v Steele (1841) 8 M & W 858; 151 ER 1288 CASES CITED : Skalkos v T & S Recoveries Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 281; (2004) 65 NSWLR 151 Motor Trade Finances Prestige Leasing Pty Ltd v Elderslie Finance Corporation Ltd & Ors [2005] NSWSC 921 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Hattersley [2001] NSWSC 60; (2001) 51 NSWLR 333
April Fine Paper Macao Commercial Offshore Ltd PARTIES : v Moore Business Systems Australia Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50092/09
COUNSEL : Applicant: J Stoljar SC & P Reynolds Respondent: J Tobin
SOLICITORS : Applicant: MAS Law Respondent: Gadens Lawyers
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate