NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Gittany v McDowell [2009] NSWSC 591 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 06/05/09, 07/05/09, 19/06/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 June 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Forster J at 1
DECISION : See paragraph 89.
Easements to drain water - Agreement to grant - Whether agreement breached - Whether agreement at an end by mutual abandonment. CATCHWORDS : Easements to drain water - Conveyancing Act (NSW) section 88K - Whether requirements of subsections (1) and (2)(c) have been met.
LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act (1919) Real Property Act (1900)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
D.T.R Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423 Durack v De Winton (1998) 9 BPR 16,403 Grattan v Simpson (1998) 9 BPR 16,649 CASES CITED : Hanny v Lewis (1999) NSWConvR 55,879 Katakouzinos v Roufir (1998) 9 BPR 17,303 Khattar v Wiese (2005) 12 BPR 23,235 Laurinda Pty Ltd v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623 Summers v The Commonwealth (1918) 25 CLR 144
Plaintiff: Robert Paul Gittany PARTIES : First Defendant: Siobhan Mary McDowell Second Defendant: Gregory John Burke
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4584/06
Plaintiff: W. La Hood (Solicitor) COUNSEL : First Defendant: P.Lane Second Defendant: G.M.McGrath
Plaintiff: W. La Hood SOLICITORS : First Defendant: R.Hood Second Defendant: F.J.Smith
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate