NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: DOWNES v AMACA Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 76 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 24/08/2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 April 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Campbell JA at 61; Handley AJA at 122
(1) Appeal allowed in part; (2) Judgment of the Dust Diseases Tribunal set aside except as to costs; DECISION: (3) Proceedings remitted to the Tribunal for the purpose of determining whether the assessed amount of $156,443.05 for the plaintiff's past and future expenses or some other amount should be deducted from his damages assessed at $311,743.05; (4) Subject to s 13(6) of the Tribunal Act the rehearing of the proceedings is limited to the issue so remitted; (5) Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS: DAMAGES - medical and other expenses payable by Dust Diseases Board - Board had not accepted liability - unsuccessful application by plaintiff for benefits - finding that renewed application would succeed - whether benefits to be deducted from damages. - DUST DISEASES - medical and other expenses payable by Board - Board had not accepted liability - unsuccessful application by plaintiff for benefits - finding that renewed application would succeed - whether benefits to be deducted from damages. - DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL - assessment of damages - statutory power of reconsideration - Dust Diseases Tribunal Act s 13(6) - relevance to deduction of medical and other expenses - unsuccessful application by plaintiff for benefits - finding that fresh application would succeed - whether Judge entitled to deduct benefits subject to reconsideration if fresh application unsuccessful.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate