NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lykouressis v Lykouresis & Ors [2009] NSWSC 80
HEARING DATE(S) : 2 to 5 February 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 February 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J
DECISION : Judgment for Plaintiff against First Defendant; judgment for Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants.
CATCHWORDS : DECEIT – First Defendant induced deceased to lend money to company to start a business when First Defendant had no intention that company would carry on business – First Defendant withdrew loan monies from company for benefit of himself and family. - HELD: First Defendant liable in deceit. - DIRECTORS' DUTIES – First Defendant breached statutory and equitable duties as director – DERIVATIVE CLAIM – LEAVE TO PROCEED – administratrix of deceased's estate sought leave under CA s 237 to bring suit in company's name against First Defendant's family who had withdrawn money from company's account – relief sought related only to status of administratrix as secured creditor of company, not to status as shareholder. - HELD: Application for leave not "in good faith" – leave refused. - COSTS: successful Defendants were guilty of dishonest conduct – claim against them failed only because Plaintiff had not appointed receiver who could have sued in company's name without leave – successful Defendants deprived of costs order.
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – s 180(1), s 181(1), s 182(1), s 237, s 420, s 1317H
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
- Antoun v R [2006] HCA 2 - Barnes v Addy (1874) LR9ChApp 244 - Cesan v The Queen (2008) 83 ALJR 43 - Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd (2008) 65 ACSR 661 - Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 - Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 - Galea v Galea (1990) 19 NSWLR 263 - Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd (2003) 56 NSWLR 298 - Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 CASES CITED : - McLean v Lake Como Venture Pty Ltd [2004] 2 Qd R 280 - Maher v Honeysett & Maher Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 859 - Malouf v Malouf [2006] NSWCA 83 - Melbourne Steamship Co Ltd v Moorehead (1912) 15 CLR 333 - North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service Inc v Bradley (2004) 218 CLR 146 - Reg v Watson; ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248 - South Johnstone Mill Ltd v Dennis [2007] FCA 1448, 64 ACSR 447 - Spies v R (2000) 201 CLR 603 - Swansson v R.A. Pratt Properties Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 313 - Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 - Walker v Wimborne (1976) 137 CLR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate