NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 73 NSWLR 226
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Wang v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 67
HEARING DATE(S) : 2 February 2009, 3 February 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 20 February 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Schmidt AJ
1. The appeal be upheld. DECISION : 2. The Law Society pay Mr Wang $130,000 plus interest from the Fidelity Fund. 3. The Law Society pay Mr Wang's costs of the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - appeal - claim against Fidelity Fund - the role of the Law Society in appeal proceedings - Hardiman principle - Law Society's proper role that of active contradictor - whether provisions of the Legal Profession Act 2004 applied to appeal - merits of appeal - criminal enterprises - money received in course of solicitor's practice - trust money - default by solicitor - whether plaintiff ought to have known of illegality - appeal upheld - costs
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 1972 (Vic) LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004 Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
R v The Australian Broadcasting Tribunal and Ors; ex parte Hardiman and Ors (1980) 144 CLR 13 Community Television Sydney Limited v Australian Broadcasting Authority and Anor (No 2) (2004) 136 FCR 338 Law Society of New South Wales v Glenorcy Pty Ltd and Ors (2006) 67 NSWLR 169 CASES CITED : Laurent v the Law Society of New South Wales [2000] NSWSC 1103 Laurent v Law Society of New South Wales [2002] NSWSC 655 TXU Electricity Ltd v Office of the Regulator-General (2001) 3 VR 93 Swart v Carr [2006] NSWSC 1302
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate