NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 195 A Crim R 63
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : MAJZOUB v KEPREOKIS & ORS [2009] NSWSC 314
HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday 12 March 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 April 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1
DECISION : Amended summons dismissed
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW – search warrants – validity – whether the warrant was invalid on its face for failing to sufficiently recite an offence in accordance with the requirements of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act and Regulation – consideration of what constitutes adequate specification of an offence – where the warrant referred to the relevant provisions of a criminal statute and a short description of the offences – warrant valid – amended summons dismissed
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Regulation 2005 Search Warrants Act 1985 Search Warrants Regulation 1999
ACS v Anderson [1975] 1 NSWLR 212 Anderson v Attorney General (NSW) [1987] 10 NSWLR 198 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Cloran (1984) 4 FCR 151 Ballis v Randall [2007] NSWSC 422 Cain v Glass (No 2) [1985] 3 NSWLR 230 Carroll v Attorney General (NSW) (1993) 70 A Crim R 162 Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Jiang (2001) 183 ALR 604 Commissioner of Police v Atkinson [1991] 23 NSWLR 495 Conwell v Tapfield [1981] 1 NSWLR 595 at 601 Flanagan v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (1996) 60 FCR 149 Gedeon v Commissioner of the New South Wales Crime Commission [2008] HCA 43; (2008) 249 ALR 398 Love v Attorney-General (NSW) (1990) 169 CLR 307 Pressler v Holzberger (1989) 44 A Crim R 261 R v Elliott (1996) 185 CLR 250 R v Iorlano (1983) 151 CLR 678 Seymour v Attorney-General (Cth) (1984) 4 FCR 498 State of New South Wales v Corbett (2007) 230 CLR 606 Tye v Commissioner of Police (1995) 84 A Crim R 147 Wright v Queensland Police Service (2002) 2 Qd R 667 Wilkes v Wood (1763) Lofft 1 at [18] CASES CITED : Entick v Carrington (1765) 2 Wils KB 275 Money v Leach (1765) 1 Black W 555) Lawrie v Muir [1950] SLT 37 Crowley v Murphy (1981) 52 FLR 123 R v Tillett; Ex parte Newton (1969) 14 FLR 101 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Parker v Churchill (1985) 9 FCR 316 at 319 Different Solutions Pty Limited v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (No 2) [2008] FCA 1686 Optical Prescription Spectacle Makes Pty Ltd v Withers (1987) 13 FCR 594 Douglas v Blackler [2001] NSWSC 901 Wright v Queensland Police Service (2002) 2 Qd R 667 Warner v Elder (NSWSC, 23 April 1997, unreported); Carver v Clerk of the Court, Local Court at Blacktown (NSWSC, Black AJ 13 March 1998, unreported) Ryder v Morley (1986) 12 FCR 438 Beneficial Finance Corporation v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1991) 31 FCR 523 Brewer v Castles (No 2) 1 FCR 55 Arno v Forsyth (1986) 9 FCR 576 New South Wales v Corbett (2007) 230 CLR 606 Parker v Churchill (1985) 9 FCR 316 at 320 Parker v Churchill (1986) 9 FCR 334 at 335 Bradrose v Commissioner of Police, ex parte Bradrose (1989) 2 Qd R 304 Williams v Keelty [2001] FCA 1301; (2001) 184 ALR 411
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate