NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Xue v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 227
HEARING DATE(S): 02/09/2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 September 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1; Hoeben J at 2; McCallum J at 70
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. The appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentence appeal - whether parity is a consideration when assessing objective seriouisness of offence - whether refusal to find special circumstances constituted error - whether parity principles applied where co-offender not involved - whether parity principle applied to co-offender.
LEGISLATION CITED: Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Meager v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 215 CASES CITED : Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 Regina v Araya [2005] NSWCCA 283 Regina v Gao; Regina v Lim [2007] NSWCCA 343 Tatana v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 398
PARTIES: Li Min Xue - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/16010013
COUNSEL: Mr MP King - Applicant Mr P Leask - Respondent Crown
SOLICITORS: Baker Ryrie Rickards Titmarsh - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2007/11/0172
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: RA Hulme DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 20/06/2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2007/16010013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate