NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Pollard v Wilson [2010] NSWCA 68 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 17 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 April 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Macfarlan JA at 1; Young JA at 2; McClellan CJ at CL at 3
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: TORTS – Negligence – liability for others' negligence – agency – whether first respondent liable as principal for actions of husband or contractors with which she had no direct involvement – whether first respondent vicariously liable for actions of husband or contractors - TORTS – Negligence – causation - TORTS – Negligence – liability of second respondent – effect of failure to notify neighbouring residents of amended development plans – alleged failure to consider heritage impact in approving development application – whether Council obliged to supervise works not requiring Council approval – effect of failure to include tree on Significant Tree Register negligent - TORTS – Negligence – liability of second respondent – causation - PROCEDURE – Application to amend statement of claim – whether trial judge's refusal to allow application appropriate - PROCEDURE – Judges – application for disqualification – bias – whether trial judge's conduct during trial evidenced bias - PROCEDURE – Judgments and orders – obligation to provide reasons – whether trial judge's reasons adequate - EVIDENCE – Expert report – admissibility – whether expert provided appropriate factual basis for his opinions – effect of trial judge's failure to read entire report before ruling – whether appellants denied a proper hearing - DAMAGES – Quantum – whether approach of trial judge appropriate
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 Civil Procedure Act 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate