NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Christopoulos v Levitt [2010] NSWCA 362
HEARING DATE(S): 8 December 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at [1], [17]; Macfarlan JA at [16]
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 8 December 2010
DECISION: Application be dismissed with costs. [The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE – Application for leave to appeal – Whether chance of worthwhile result justified the grant of leave.
CATEGORY: Procedural and other rulings
Theodoros CHRISTOPOULOS (first applicant) PARTIES: Sotiria CHRISTOPOULOS (second applicant) Stewart LEVITT (respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 2009/333465
COUNSEL: [Theodoros CHRISTOPOULOS (in person)] S J BURCHETT (respondent)
SOLICITORS: -- (applicants) Levitt Robinson Solicitors & Attorneys (respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 431/2009
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Garling DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 7 October 2009
- 4 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 2009/333465 DC 431/2009
HODGSON JA MACFARLAN JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate