NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : El-Saeidy v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2009] NSWSC 1059
HEARING DATE(S) : 14 September 2009, 16 September 2009, 18 September 2009 JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Rothman J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 18 September 2009
(i) Judgment for the defendant;
DECISION : (ii) Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to these proceedings, as agreed or assessed;
(iii) Proceedings be dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal – prerogative relief sought – privative clause – current application against interlocutory order – overlapping factual issues in civil and criminal proceedings – reliance on right to silence and right/privilege against self-incrimination – application premature and caught by ouster provision – summons dismissed
Civil Procedure Act 2005 Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Residential Tenancies Act 1987 Supreme Court Act 1970 The Constitution
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Healthcare Complaints Commission v Wingate (2007) NSWCA 326 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED : Maxwell v Keun (1928) 1 KB 645 Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 1; (1997) 189 CLR 146 Sali v SPC Ltd [1993] HCA 47; (1993) 116 ALR 625 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate