NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Goodman Holdings v Hughes [2009] NSWSC 682
HEARING DATE(S) : 8 July 2009 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 8 July 2009
DECISION : See paragraphs [55] to [57] of the judgment.
CATCHWORDS : ARBITRATION - judicial review of award - whether arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction - whether 'manifest error on the face of the award' - whether arbitrator failed to give reasons.
LEGISLATION CITED : Commercial Arbitration Act 1984
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Ballantyne and Sullivan v Electricity Trust (SA) (1994) 62 SASR 133 Berbette Pty Ltd v Hansa [1976] VR 385 Garner v Rohanna Pty Ltd [1999] WASCA 178 CASES CITED : Natoli v Walker (1994) 217 ALR 201 Panmal Constructions Pty Ltd v Warringah Formwork Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 204 Promenade Investments Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (1992) 26 NSWLR 203 Suttor v Gundowda (1950) 81 CLR 418
Goodman Holdings Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Richard Peter Hughes (First Defendant) Manuden Consulting Pty Ltd (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50002/09
COUNSEL : R J Weber SC (Plaintiff) S A Kerr / T J Breakspear (Defendants)
SOLICITORS : Blake Dawson Lawyers (Plaintiff) Lexxon Lawyers (Defendants)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
McDOUGALL J
8 July 2009 (ex tempore – revised 9 July 2009)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate