NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Western Districts Developments Pty Limited and Turnpike Lane Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 311
HEARING DATE(S): 12 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 30 September 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Campbell JA at 1; Preston CJ of LEC at 1
DECISION: 1. Respondent to pay applicants' costs of proceedings before Harrison AsJ. 2. Respondent to have certificate under Suitors' Fund Act 1951 in respect of appeal before Court of Appeal and appeal before Harrison AsJ, if otherwise eligible.
CATCHWORDS: ORDERS - additional orders consequent on primary judgment - costs of proceedings below - certificate under Suitors' Fund Act 1951
LEGISLATION CITED: Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Supreme Court Act 1970
CATEGORY: Consequential orders
PARTIES: Western Districts Developments Pty Limited and Turnpike Lane Pty Limited - Appellants Baulkham Hills Shire Council - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40365/08
APPELLANTS Mr A Fernon COUNSEL: RESPONDENT Mr D Grieve QC Mr J Kildea
APPELLANTS SOLICITORS: Low Doherty & Stratford, Blacktown RESPONDENT Matthew Pearce, Baulkham Hills Shire Council
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Common Law Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC11069/08
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Harrison AsJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 31 July 2008
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Western Districts Developments v Baulkham HIlls Shire Council [2008] NSWSC 770
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40365/08 SC 11069/08
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate