NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: El-Jalkh, Antoine v R [2009] NSWCCA 139
HEARING DATE(S): 5 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 June 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; James J at 2; Simpson J at 158
1. Leave under r 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules granted to argue grounds of appeal 2 and 3. DECISION: 2. Ground 2 upheld. 3. The appeal against conviction allowed. 4. New trial ordered.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW — character of the accused — summing-up — putting the defence case — proviso to s 6(1) Criminal Appeal Act
Crimes Act Criminal Appeal Act LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Criminal Procedure Act Customs Act
Butera v Director of Public Prosecutions (Victoria) (1987) 164 CLR 180 Cleland v The Queen (1982) 151 CLR 1 Melbourne v The Queen (1998-1999) 198 CLR 1 R v Coleman (1990) 19 NSWLR 467 R v Condon (1995) 83 A Crim R 335 R v Fuller (1994) 34 NSWLR 233 R v Gutierrez [2004] NSWCCA 22 CASES CITED : R v Lawrence (1982) AC 510-519 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v Piazza (1997) 94 A Crim R 459 R v Tillott (1991) 53 A Crim R 46 R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 Robinson v The Queen (1991) 180 CLR 531 Simic v The Queen (1980) 144 CLR 319 Taleb v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 119 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300
PARTIES: EL-JALKH, Antoine Regina
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate