NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 76 NSWLR 230
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Heperu Pty Limited v Belle [2009] NSWCA 252
HEARING DATE(S): 9 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 August 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Campbell JA at 179; Handley AJA at 180
1. The appellants file and serve within 28 days submissions on relief in the light of the reasons. DECISION: 2. The respondent file and serve within a further 28 days submissions on relief in the light of the reasons. 3. The appellants file and serve submissions in reply within a further 14 days.
CATCHWORDS: BANKING AND FINANCE – bank account authority - authority given to agent to operate account – liability of principal for deposit and withdrawal of fraudulently obtained funds by the agent– scope of authority given to agent to operate account - whether scope of authority included authority to deposit funds misappropriated from third parties – no liability where acts were beyond the scope of the authority given to the agent - BANKING AND FINANCE – bank account authority – liability of principal for withdrawal of funds from account derived from the proceeds of misappropriated cheques – whether withdrawal of funds alone is having use and benefit of the funds – principal did not authorise to use the account to receive or deploy misappropriated funds – no liability of the principal in these circumstances - RESTITUTION – money had and received – receipt and benefit of funds in bank account by owner of the account – liability based on possession and control of funds – requirement that owner of account knew or ought to have known that they had possession of control of the funds – "ought to have known" requires some fault on the part of the recipient – owner of account had no knowledge and ought not to have known in the circumstances - RESTITUTION - money had and received – liability of volunteer recipient of misappropriated funds for the traceable proceeds held at the time of the trial – liability separate from liability in equity as a constructive trustee under Barnes v Addy – recognition at law of an equitable interest in property – personal remedy to value of equitable property interest in property in hands of another - liability for proceeds remaining not for amount received - EQUITY – trusts – constructive trust - liability as constructive trustee under first limb Barnes v Addy - no notice and no knowledge – liability as constructive as trustee under second limb of Barnes v Addy – no notice and no knowledge - TRACING – personal liability for value remaining of misappropriated funds that can be traced into real property – tracing of misappropriated cheques into mortgage repayments made on real property – tracing through mixed fund - REMEDIES – remedies at law and in equity – availability of a personal remedy to value of an interest in property where property in hands of another - GOODS – receiver of goods as finder – traceable proceeds of cheques into real property are not goods – law of receiver of goods as finder not applicable on the facts
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate