NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : SHELDON v SCERRI [2008] NSWSC 892
HEARING DATE(S) : 11, 12, 13 and 18 August 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 August 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1
DECISION : On the plaintiff's claim in debt, there is, by consent, judgment for the plaitniff for the amount claimed. Judgment in favour of the cross-defendant on the cross-claim.
CATCHWORDS : TRUSTS – relationship of accountant and client – professional fees owing to accountant/cross-defendant at time of agreement to purchase shares – proposal by client (cross-claimant) to buy shares on a "tip" that same would escalate in value in two weeks – profit to be credited – no trust created – contract made conferring a benefit on the client as distinct from a company controlled by him
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005
PARTIES : Peter SHELDON v Steven John SCERRI & ANOR
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC No 2757 of 2007
COUNSEL : P: D D Knoll D: P A Beale
SOLICITORS : P: Leon M Ratner & Associates D: McGrath Dicembre & Co
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
HALL J
FRIDAY 29 AUGUST 2008
No 2757 of 2007
PETER SHELDON v STEVEN JOHN SCERRI & ANOR JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: These proceedings concern a claim by the plaintiff/cross-defendant for professional fees and a cross-claim by the first defendant, Mr Scerri, a former client of the plaintiff, in which an order for specific performance of an alleged trust is sought and an order for the transfer of shares or an equivalent number of shares is claimed. Alternatively, Mr Scerri, as cross-claimant, claims damages for alleged breach of trust or alleged breach of contract.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate