NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Spina v Permanent Custodians Limited (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 419
HEARING DATE(S): On the papers.
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 December 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at [1]; Campbell JA at [2]; Young JA at [3]
DECISION: Orders reformulated.
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 14, 56 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Part 36.16.3C
CATEGORY: Consequential orders
Hancock v Arnold (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 19 CASES CITED: Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd v The J Aron Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group Inc (2007) 70 NSWLR 411 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Refrigerated Roadways Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 336
PARTIES: Joe Spina (Appellant) Permanent Custodians Limited (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40313/08
COUNSEL: A Leopold SC and J Clifton (Appellant) S A Gregory (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Grogan & Webb (Appellant) Hicksons Lawyers (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC 2393/06
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hammerschlag J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 30 June 2008
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Angelina Spina v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2008] NSWSC 561
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40313 of 2008 TOBIAS JA CAMPBELL JA YOUNG JA
Thursday 17 December 2009 SPINA v PERMANENT CUSTODIANS LIMITED (NO 2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate