NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: REGINA v Fadde ASSAAD [2009] NSWCCA 182
HEARING DATE(S): 26 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 14 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Hidden J at 6; McCallum J at 7
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against inadequacy of sentence - drug addiction at time of commission of offences - whether sentences inadequate having regard to Henry guideline judgment - sentences manifestly inadequate - residual discretion not to interfere with sentences imposed - steps taken by offender towards rehabilitation and delay between offences and sentencing warranting exercise of the discretion.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Douar v R (2005) 159 A Crim R 154 Legge v R [2007] NSWCCA 244 R v Blackman and Walters [2001] NSWCCA 121 CASES CITED : R v Henry & Ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Hernando (2002) 136 A Crim R 451 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 187 Yardley v Betts (1979) 22 SASR 108
PARTIES: REGINA (Applicant) Fadde ASSAAD (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/12244; 2008/3845
COUNSEL: P Miller (Applicant) N Steel (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) (Applicant) Kiki Kyriacou Lawyers (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/11/1465; 2008/11/1466
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Armitage ADCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 17 April 2009
- 14 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2008/3845 2008/12244
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate