NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Bakarich v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2010] NSWCA 130
HEARING DATE(S): On the papers
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 June 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA
(1) Mr Bakarich's application to re-open the appeal fixed for 13 August 2010. DECISION: (2) This application to proceed on material provided in accordance with the directions made on 15 December 2009, as modified on 23 March 2010, and on no other material. (3) Direct that no subpoenas be issued in relation to this application.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE - Application to re-open appeal - What directions appropriate.
LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Act 1970 s46(4)
CATEGORY: Procedural and other rulings
Bakarich & Ors. v. Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2007] NSWCA 169 CASES CITED: Bakarich v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2004] NSWSC 283
PARTIES: Anthony George Bakarich as Executor of the estates of the late Mary Patricia BAKARICH and Allan John BAKARICH, Anthony George BAKARICH, VITLERN PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 060 679), A BAKARICH INDUSTRIES PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 317 577) (appellants) COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 2005/270113
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Common Law Division
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Nicholas J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 20 April 2004
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Bakarich v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2004] NSWSC 283
- 6 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 2005/270113
HODGSON JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate