NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 204 A Crim R 315
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Justins v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 242 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 4 June 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 October 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Simpson J at 132; Johnson J at 275
DECISION: The appeal should be allowed, the conviction quashed and a new trial ordered.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - offences against the person - homicide - where the deceased had an illness causing cognitive degeneration - where the deceased consumed a drug given to him by the appellant knowing that by doing so he would die - whether the act causing death was that of the deceased or the appellant - whether the trial judge's directions on the mental capacity of the deceased were erroneous - whether possessing the capacity to commit suicide requires a person to make an "informed decision to take one's own life" - CRIMINAL LAW - offences against the person - manslaughter - whether manslaughter by criminal negligence available where a person makes a drug available for another's consumption intending that death will result - whether failure to make enquiries of a person's mental capacity capable of constituting a breach of duty causing death - CRIMINAL LAW - procedure - summing up - whether trial miscarried due to trial judge not identifying essential element of the offence in written directions but doing so in oral directions - CRIMINAL LAW - appeal and new trial - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 8(1) - whether an acquittal or a new trial should be ordered - WORDS AND PHRASES - "suicide"
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
Australian Capital Territory v JT [2009] ACTSC 105; (2009) 232 FLR 322 Banks v Goodfellow [1870] LR 5 QB 549 Brightwater Care Group (Inc) v Rossiter [2009] WASC 229 Clift v Schwabe (1846) 3 CB 437 Dyers v R [2002] HCA 45; (2002) 210 CLR 285 Gammage v R (1969) 122 CLR 444 H Limited v J and Anor [2010] SASC 176; (2010) 240 FLR 402 Hong v R [2009] NSWCCA 242 Hunter and New England Area Health Service v A by his Tutor T [2009] NSWSC 761; (2009) 74 NSWLR 88 In Re Davis [1968] 1 QB 72 Nydam v R [1977] VR 430 Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107 People v Beardsley 113 NW 1128 (1907) CASES CITED : R v Downs (1985) 3 NSWLR 312 R v Sam (No. 17) [2009] NSWSC 803 R v Schneidas (No 2) [1981] 2 NSWLR 713 R v Taktak (1988) 14 NSWLR 226 Re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1994] 1 WLR 290 Re Estate of Paul Francis Hodges Deceased; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam 95 Regina v Kennedy (No 2) [2007] UKHL 38; [2008] 1 AC 269 Reid v The Queen [1980] AC 343 Rodriguez v British Columbia (Attorney General) [1993] 3 SCR 519 Stuart v Kirkland-Veenstra [2009] HCA 15; (2009) 237 CLR 215 The Queen v Crabbe (1985) 156 CLR 464 The Queen v Lavender [2005] HCA 37; (2005) 222 CLR 67 The Queen v Taufahema [2007] HCA 11; (2007) 228 CLR 232 Wilson v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 313
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate