NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Thomas v Shaw [No 2] [2009] NSWSC 718
16/2/09 - 20/2/09 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/3/09 26/6/09 24/7/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 July 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J
DECISION : I vacate order (2) made on 26 June 2009 and, in lieu thereof, I order that the defendants pay the plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis up to and including 24 November 2008, and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
CATCHWORDS : CIVIL LAW - Practice and Procedure - indemnity costs
LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
Maitland Hospital v Fisher [No 2] (1992) 27 NSWLR 721 CASES CITED : Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 Van Doore v Mendez & Ors [No 2] (unreported, Supreme Court, 30.6.1997) Dr Peter Locke v Dr Colin ova [2005] NSWSC 799
Cameron Brock Thomas (by his tutor Doreen Thomas) (Pl) PARTIES : William Richard Shaw (1st Def) Susan Joyce Shaw (2nd Def)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2008/20166
COUNSEL : R Royle (Pl) N Polin (Defs)
SOLICITORS : Slater & Gordon (Pl) Moray & Agnew (Defs)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
KIRBY J
Thursday 30 July 2009
2008/20166 Cameron Brock THOMAS (by his tutor Doreen Thomas) v William Richard SHAW and Susan Joyce SHAW
JUDGMENT [No 2] – Indemnity costs 1 KIRBY J: On 26 June 2009, I gave judgment for the plaintiff in which I made the following orders: 1. There should be a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $853,396, subject to order (3) below.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate