NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Talay v R [2010] NSWCCA 308
HEARING DATE(S): 1 November 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Schmidt J at 59; Howie AJ at 60
DECISION: The application for extension of time be refused.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – application for extension of time – delay largely unexplained – application refused - CRIMINAL LAW – appeal by stated case – appeal to District Court from Local Court – prosecution for offence of break, enter and steal – appeal dismissed, conviction and sentence confirmed – request to submit question of law – prosecuting authority not notified of request – adequacy of formulation of questions of law in stated case – stated case defective
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
City of Hawthorn v Victorian Welfare Association [1970] VR 205 Collins v State Rail Authority of NSW (1986) 5 NSWLR 209 DPP v Cassell (1995) 80 A Crim R 160 Ex parte McGavin; Re Byrne (1945) 46 SR (NSW) 58 Industrial Equity Ltd v Commissioner for Corporate Affairs [1990] VR 780 Melwood Units Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Main Roads [1979] AC 426 CASES CITED : R v GK [2001] NSWCCA 413; 53 NSWLR 317 R v Madden (1996) 85 A Crim R 367 R v Milat (1996) 87 A Crim R 446 R v Rigby [1956] HCA 38; 100 CLR 146 Re Van der Lubbe (1949) 49 SR 309 Thomas v The King [1937] HCA 83; 59 CLR 279 Zukerman v Law Society of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 292
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate