NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Jared Deane PATERSON [2010] NSWCCA 233
HEARING DATE(S): 5 May 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 14 October 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Rothman J at 2; Barr AJ at 69
DECISION: (i) The appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – Crown appeal – armed robbery and armed robbery with wounding – concurrent non-parole periods – manifest inadequacy – compelling subjective circumstances – sentence within range available to sentencing judge – no less severe sentence warranted
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No 1 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 518; (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Clare v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 30; (2008) 181 A Crim R 450 Johnson v R [2004] HCA 15; (2004) 78 ALJR 616 Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 CASES CITED : Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Henry [2007] NSWCCA 90 R v Tory [2006] NSWCCA 18 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465
PARTIES: Regina (Applicant) Jared Deane Paterson (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2009/59066
COUNSEL: M Cinque (Applicant) R Burgess (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Applicant) Legal Aid Commission of NSW (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate