NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 197 A Crim R 50876 NSWLR 167
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: TJ v R [2009] NSWCCA 257 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 26 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 October 2009
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Hidden J at 76; McCallum J at 84
DECISION: By majority: appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - appeal against conviction - sexual assault - particular grounds of appeal - misdirection and non-direction - direction where accused disadvantaged by delay in complaint - whether Longman warning adequate - requirements of Longman warning - whether a warning required in terms - whether particular words required - INTERPRETATION - amendment to s 294 Criminal Procedure Act - transitional provisions - transitional provisions not to apply to proceedings commenced before the commencement of the amendments - when proceedings commence - WORDS & PHRASES - "proceedings" - "caution" - "warning" - "in terms"
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Criminal Procedure Amendment (Sexual and Other Offences) Act 2006 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) Evidence Act 1995 Evidence Act 1906 (WA)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Allerton v Director of Public Prosecutions (1991) NSWLR 24 550 Angliss v The State of Western Australia [2005] WASCA 162 Carroll v The State of Western Australia [2004] WASCA 254 Christophers v The Queen [2000] WASCA 308; (2000) 23 WAR 106 Crampton v The Queen [2001] HCA 60; (2000) 206 CLR 161 Crisafio v R [2003] WASCA 104; (2003) 27 WAR 169 Doggett v R [2001] HCA 46; (2001) 208 CLR 343 DPW v R [2006] NSWCA 295; 164 A Crim R 583 DRE v R [2006] NSWCCA 280; (2006) 164 A Crim R 400 Dyers v The Queen (2002) HCA 45; (2002) 210 CLR 285 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Gilham v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 323; (2007) 178 A Crim R 72 JJB v R [2006] NSWCCA 126; (2006) 161 A Crim R 187 Longman v The Queen (1989) HCA 60; (1989) 168 CLR 79 R v BDX [2009] VSCA 28; (2009) 194 A Crim R 57 R v BWT [2002] NSWCCA 60; (2002) 54 NSWLR 241 R v Channell [2002] NSWCCA 187 R v DBG [2002] NSWCCA 328 CASES CITED : R v GEA [2002] NSWCCA 222 R v GS [2003] NSWCCA 73 R v Halmi [2005] NSWCCA 2; (2005) 62 NSWLR 263 R v Hull (1989) 16 NSWLR 385 R v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 281, 64 NSWLR 10 R v Johnston (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 R v Kesisyan [2003] NSWCCA 259 R v Lyberoupolos [2002] NSWCCA 280 R v Nicolaidis (1994) 33 NSWLR 362 R v SJB [2002] NSWCCA 163 R v Taylor (No 2) (2008) 18 VR 613 R v Taylor [2003] NSWCCA 194 R v WRC [2002] NSWCCA 210; (2002) 130 A Crim R 89 R v WSP [2005] NSWCCA 427 RBK v The Queen [2004] WASCA 216 Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192; (2006) 162 A Crim R 88 Sepulveda v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 379; (2006) 167 A Crim R 108 Sheehan v R [2006] NSWCCA 233 Spencer [1987] AC 128 Tillman v Attorney General for the State of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 327; 178 A Crim R 133
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate