NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited [2010] NSWSC 1036
HEARING DATE(S) : 10 September 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 September 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Harrison J
DECISION : Rimanui's application to uplift exhibit J for the purpose of having it forensically examined is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CIVIL PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for access to documentary exhibit for forensic examination – quaere the existence of any genuine dispute as to authenticity or identity of the document– no reasonable forensic purpose identified – whether request reasonable in the circumstances - application refused
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
CASES CITED : NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited & Ors [2010] NSWSC 968 Trimcoll Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] NSWCA 307
NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Rimanui Farms Limited (First Defendant) Gil Gil Farming Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Lloyds Syndicate No 1243 (Third Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2003/93179
J E Maconachie QC with S B Docker and M W E Maconachie COUNSEL : T J Hancock with J P Donohoe and A T Martin (First Defendant) B Loukas (Second Defendant) G T W Miller QC with D A Lloyd (Third Defendant)
TurksLegal (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Webb and Boland (First Defendant) Doyle Wilson (Second Defendant) Riley Gray-Spencer (Third Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate