NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : The University of Sydney v Cadence Australia Pty Limited & Anor [2009] NSWSC 635 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 3 July 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Hammerschlag J
DECISION : Orders restraining the first defendant from seeking adjudication of its payment claim dated 31 May 2009.
CATCHWORDS : BUILDING AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTS — payment claim — Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) ss 5, 13, 14, 15, 17, 22 – where claimant seeks to re-agitate unsuccessful claim already adjudicated upon as part of a new wider claim – held claimant's statutory entitlement was exhausted and re-use of the machinery of the Act in the circumstances was an abuse of process and should be restrained – Dualcorp Pty Ltd v Remo Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 69 and Perform (NSW) Pty Ltd v Mev-Aus Pty Ltd trading as Novatec Constructions Systems [2009] NSWSC 416 followed
LEGISLATION CITED : Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW
Dualcorp Pty Ltd v Remo Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 69 Perform (NSW) Pty Ltd v Mev-Aus Pty Ltd trading as Novatec Constructions Systems [2009] NSWSC 416 CASES CITED : Brewer v Brewer & Anor (1953) 88 CLR 1 Williams & Ors v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 Ex parte The Amalgamated Engineering Union (Australian Section); Re Jackson & Anor (1937) 38 SR (NSW) 13 Kuligowski v Metrobus (2004) 220 CLR 363
The University of Sydney - Plaintiff PARTIES : Cadence Australia Pty Limited - First Defendant Helen Durham - Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate