NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: HAN, Zhi Qiang v R [2009] NSWCCA 300
HEARING DATE(S): 19 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 December 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Campbell JA at 1; Howie J at 5; Rothman J at 6
(i) Leave to appeal the sentence, imposed by his Honour Judge Knox SC on the applicant on 23 March 2009, be granted; DECISION: (ii) Appeal be dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – manifest excess – proper range of sentences – use of statistics – appeal refused
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Johnson v R [2004] HCA 15; (2004) 205 ALR 346; (2004) 78 ALJR 616 Lowe v R [1984] HCA 46; (1984) 154 CLR 606 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 22 CLR 357 Mill v R [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 CASES CITED : Postiglione v R [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Araya [2005] NSWCCA 283 R v F [2002] NSWCCA 320; (2002) 132 A Crim R 308 R v George [2004] NSWCCA 247; (2004) 149 A Crim R 38 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Singh [2001] NSWCCA 424
PARTIES: Zhi Qiang Han (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/8134
COUNSEL: P Boulton SC / J Overall (Applicant) F Veltro (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Ren Zhou Lawyers (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/8134
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate