NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave dismissed with costs by the High Court, 12 February 2010 s267/2009
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Shimokawa v Lewis [2009] NSWCA 266
HEARING DATE(S): 14 July 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 September 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Giles JA at 2; Ipp JA at 199
DECISION: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Set aside the verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $1,444,851 and the order that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs; (3) Remit the proceedings to the District Court for a new trial on all issues except whether the appellant had failed to take reasonable care in his driving; (4) Costs of the first trial to be in the disposal of the judge conducting the new trial; (5) Respondent pay appellant's costs of the appeal and have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if otherwise qualified.
CATCHWORDS: TORTS - negligence - motor vehicle accident - whether plaintiff in vehicle at time defendant collided with it - appellate review of trial judge's findings - various elements in challenge to fact-finding - in particular failure to note consistency of evidence of two unconnected groups of witnesses - detailed consideration of judge's reasons - appellate court must conduct real review - errors in process of fact-finding despite credibility-based findings - new trial ordered save for an issue not the subject of appeal.
Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167; Anikin v Sierra [2004] HCA 64; (2004) 79 ALJR 452; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Container Terminals Australia Ltd v Huseyin [2000] NSWCA 320; Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Hyde (1989) 63 ALJR 63; CASES CITED: Kuru v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 26; (2008) 236 CLR 1; Lujans v Yarrabee Coal Company Pty Ltd [2008] HCA 51; (2008) 249 ALR 663; Pateman v Higgin (1957) 97 CLR 521; Rebenta Pty Ltd v Wise [2009] NSWCA 212; SS Hontestroom v SS Sagaporack (1927) AC 37; Swain v Waverley Municipal Council [2005] HCA 4; (2005) 220 CLR 517; Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Sydney v Hogan [2001] NSWCA 381; (2001) 53 NSWLR 343; Yarrabee Coal Company Pty Ltd v Lujans [2009] NSWCA 85.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate