NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 257 ALR 558233 FLR 28372 ACSR 50676 NSWLR 6927 ACLC 1,166
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Oates v Consolidated Capital Services Ltd [2009] NSWCA 183 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 16 February 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Allsop P at 2; Campbell JA at 5
DECISION: (1) Appeal dismissed with costs. (2) Notice of Motion to join Messrs Hawkins and Tyne dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: CORPORATIONS – derivative action – sections 236 and 237 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – meaning of "proceedings on behalf of a company" – whether using a statutory derivative action to cause the company to bring a general law derivative action would be considered "proceedings on behalf of a company" – meaning of "proceedings" – meaning of "on behalf of a company" – distinction between the rights of members or shareholders and officers or directors under section 236 – whether a person bringing proceedings on behalf of a company must assert a cause of action for the benefit of the company – CORPORATIONS – derivative action – general law – whether leave is required to commence a derivative action at general law – distinction between leave to commence proceedings and a trial of a preliminary issue – history of the procedure for bringing a derivative action –CORPORATIONS – membership, rights and remedies – reflective loss – whether a shareholder of a holding company can obtain a remedy for loss suffered by a subsidiary company – DAMAGES – general principles – reflective loss – whether a shareholder of a holding company can obtain a remedy for loss suffered by a subsidiary company – whether the losses are to be considered separate – EQUITY – equitable remedies – whether the reflective loss principle applies to equitable remedies – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – appeal – general principles – points and objections not taken below – requirement to examine the pleadings and the oral and written admissions – whether argument sought to be raised on appeal was argued at trial – EMPLOYMENT LAW – the relationship of employer and employee – whether property was created in the course of employment – whether property belongs to the employer or employee – STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – sections 236 and 237 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether section 237 is to be interpreted independently of section 236 – whether upon meeting the requirements of section 237 the court must grant leave – interpretation of legislative provisions in context – WORDS AND PHRASES – "proceedings" – "on behalf of" – "reflective loss"
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate