NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Wood v Inglis [2009] NSWSC 1495 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 December 2009 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 7 December 2009
DECISION : Orders for payment of pecuniary legacies
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION – Wills, probate and administration – Construction and effect of testamentary dispositions – whether pecuniary legacies should be paid when belated family provision proceedings foreshadowed – SUCCESSION – Executors and administrators – Removal and discharge – removal of joint executor by consent
LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982 s 16 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 53.4
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
CASES CITED : Wood v Inglis [2009] NSWSC 601
Pamela Ruth Wood (plaintiff) Helen Margaret Inglis (defendant) First Cross Claim: Helen Margaret Inglis (cross-claimant) Inglis Research Trust P/L (first cross-defendant) Kathryn Margaret Clark (second cross-defendant) Michael William Inglis (third cross-defendant) Pamela Ruth Wood (fourth cross-defendant) PARTIES : Fiona Jane Narlini Inglis (fifth cross-defendant) William Keith Inglis (sixth cross-defendant) Second Cross Claim: Kathryn Margaret Clark (cross-claimant) Helen Margaret Inglis (first cross-defendant) Pamela Ruth Wood (second cross-defendant) Third Cross-Claim: Pamela Ruth Wood (cross-claimant) Helen Margaret Inglis (cross-defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate