NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Kermode v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1263
HEARING DATE(S) : 17 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 23 November 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : McCallum J
DECISION : I grant leave to the plaintiff to file an amended statement of claim in accordance with these reasons.
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Obeid [2006] NSWCA 231; (2006) 66 NSWLR 605 Beran v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 107 Dow Jones v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56; (2002) 210 CLR 575 Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52 CASES CITED : Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Limited & Anor [2001] NSWSC 130 Robinson v Brighton [2007] NSWSC 1125 Sandilands v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 1250 The Buddhist Society of Western Australia v Bristile [2000] WASCA 210 Westerway v Jones and Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of NSW, Levine J, 20 August 1993, unreported)
Reginald Lionel Kermode (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (1st Defendant) Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd (2nd Defendant) Linton Besser (3rd Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20497/09
COUNSEL : Mr K P Smark SC (Plaintiff) Mr M A Polden (Defendants)
SOLICITORS : Pigott Stinson Lawyers (Plaintiff) Johnson Winter & Slattery (Defendants)
- 13 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
McCALLUM J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate