NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Fairbairn v Varvaressos [2010] NSWCA 234 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 30 March 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 September 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Campbell JA at 1; Macfarlan JA at 129; Young JA at 130
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs, including any costs arising from the Amended Notice of Appeal.
CATCHWORDS: WILLS & ESTATES – construction of will – clause determining the manner in which testator's house and contents would be dealt with – whether clause operated to cause remainder consequent on child K's death to vest in interest in two other children, D and I, from the date of testator's death, subject to defeasance if K died leaving one child above the age of 21 – ascertaining basic scheme of will as aid to construction – drawing assistance from the presumption against intestacy – vesting of a gift – whether Boraston's case was misapplied – preference for construing gift as vested – distinction between vested estates in land and contingent remainders – authorities discussed - REAL PROPERTY – vested and future contingent interests – whether limitation amounts to vested remainder or contingent remainder – discussion of concepts of "vested", "estate in land" and "contingent remainder" – relevance of Luddington v Kime – contingent remainders as property rights
Conveyancing Act 1919 Probate and Administration Act 1898 LEGISLATION CITED: Statute of Uses 1535 Statute of Wills 1540 Succession Act 2006 Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Boraston's Case (1587) 3 Co Rep 19a; 76 ER 668 Bruce v Charlton (1842) 13 Sim 65; 60 ER 26 Coorey v George (27 February 1986, unreported) Duffield v Duffield (1829) 1 Dow & Clark 268; 6 ER 525 Fairbairn v Varvaressos (Palmer J, 13 May 2009, unreported) Fairbairn v Varvaressos [2009] NSWSC 272 Hammersley v Newton [2005] WASC 221; [2005] 30 WAR 568 Hickling v Fair [1899] AC 15 Hume v Perpetual Trustees Executors and Agency Company of Tasmania Limited (1939) 62 CLR 242 In Re Firth; Loveridge v Firth [1914] 2 Ch 386 In Re Sanders Trusts (1866) 1 Eq 675 In Re Skinner Deceased [1965] VR 660 CASES CITED: Kenna v Conolly (1938) 60 CLR 583 Luddington v Kime (1697) 1 Ld Raym 203; 91 ER 1031 National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175 Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Wright (1987) 9 NSWLR 18 Perpetual Trustee Company (Ltd) v Scheiler (1948) 49 SR (NSW) 169 Re Byrne Deceased [1967] VR 96 Re Ellenborough [1903] 1 Ch 697 Re Shannon [1968] NZLR 852 Re Toohey; ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327 Smell v Dee (1707) 2 Salk 415; 91 ER 360 Tailby v Official Receiver (1888) 13 AC 523 Taylor v Graham (1878) 3 AC 1287 Tompkins v Simmons (1931) 44 CLR 546 Wagstaff v Crosby (1846) 2 Coll 746; 63 ER 943
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate