NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: HAMPTON v R [2010] NSWCCA 278
HEARING DATE(S): 22 February 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hulme J at 2; Latham J at 64
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
PARTIES: Samuel Hampton Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/15629; 2008/13980; 2008/13981; 2008/13982
COUNSEL: Applicant: Ms L Wells SC Respondent: Ms M Cinque
SOLICITORS: Applicant: Aboriginal Legal Service Respondent: S Kavanagh
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Berman DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 18 December 2008
- 20 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/15629 2008/13980 2008/13981 2008/13982
BEAZLEY JA RS HULME J LATHAM J Wednesday, 1 December 2010 Samuel HAMPTON v REGINA Judgment 1 BEAZLEY JA: I agree with Hulme J. 2 RS HULME J: On 18 December 2008, this Applicant for leave to appeal was sentenced by Berman SC DCJ to imprisonment for an effective term of 15 years, including a non-parole period of 11 years and 3 months for a series of offences of dishonesty. The principal ground of appeal is that the overall sentence was manifestly excessive. The offences for which sentences were imposed, or which were taken into account, their dates of commission, and the sentences imposed were:-
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate