NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Patonga Beach Holdings Pty Ltd v Lyons [2009] NSWSC 869
HEARING DATE(S) : 18/08/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 19 August 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Notice under rule 21.10 set aside. Return date appointed for limited notice under rule 34.1.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - notice to produce - differences between notice under rule 21.10 requiring production to the party and notice under rule 34.1 requiring production to the court - need in the first case for "specific document" to be "clearly defined" - individual document must be sought - wider scope of rule 34.1 contrasted
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 459G Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rules 21.10, 33.3(4)(a), 34.1,
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 Douglas Corporation v Currico Nominees [2007] NSWSC 113 CASES CITED : Lane v Registrar of the Supreme Court [1981] HCA 35; (1981) 148 CLR 245 Norris v Kandiah [2007] NSWSC 1296 Penrith Rugby League Club Limited v Brown [2004] NSWSC 1182
PARTIES : Patonga Beach Holdings Pty Ltd - Plaintiff John Howard Lyons, Rosebanner Pty Ltd and Australian Hotels Limited - Defendants
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2769/09
COUNSEL : Mr R M Lovas - Plaintiff Mr J B Simpkins SC - Defendants
SOLICITORS : Angela M Frost - Plaintiff Legal Ease Lawyers - Defendants
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate