NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Heperu Pty Limited v Belle (No 3) [2010] NSWCA 339
HEARING DATE(S): On the papers
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Campbell JA at 4; Handley AJA at 5
DECISION: The respondent pay 25% of the appellants' costs of the appeal. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
CATEGORY: Procedural and other rulings
Heperu Pty Limited (First Appellant) PARTIES: Kirisi Holdings Pty Limited (Second Appellant) Patrice Belle (formerly Patrice Cincotta) (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40107/08
COUNSEL: G K Burton SC, C L Cochrane (Appellants) J S Van Aalst (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Thomas Henry Bray, Sydney (Appellants) Hardings Lawyers, Sydney (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 6165/03
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Palmer J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 12 December 2007
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Heperu Pty Ltd & Ors v Morgan Brooks Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 1438
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 40107/08
ALLSOP P CAMPBELL JA HANDLEY AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate