NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 74 NSWLR 173
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Newcastle City Council v Paul Wieland [2009] NSWCA 113
HEARING DATE(S): 30 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 May 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Ipp JA at 6
DECISION: The appeal be dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE - costs - agreements as to costs - whether costs of the proceedings includes costs of mediation - application of Civil Procedure Act 2005 - s 28
Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED: Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (Qld)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Charlick Trading Pty Ltd v Australian National Railways Commissions [2001] FCA 629 CASES CITED: Higgins v Nicol (No 2) (1972) 21 FLR 34 Mackay v Hamilton [1905] VLR 457 Mead & Anor v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2007] NSWSC 500
Newcastle City Council (First Appellant) PARTIES: HP Planning Services Pty Ltd (Second Appellant) Paul Wieland (First Respondent) Janine Wieland (Second Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40082/08
COUNSEL: P R Cummings (Appellants) T A Alexis SC; D H Mitchell (Respondents)
Rockliffs (Appellants) SOLICITORS: Moray & Agnew Solictors (First respondent) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Second Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 1510/06
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Sidis DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 5 February 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate