NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Soo v Fisher and Ors trading as Fisher Cartwright Berriman [2009] NSWCA 393
HEARING DATE(S): 30 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 30 November 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 30 November 2009
I make orders 1 and 4 of the notice of motion, filed 19 November 2009, deleting the words "or separately therefrom" from order 4 (e), and deleting also 4(a). [Orders set out below for ease of reference: 1. That execution upon the orders of his Honour Acting Justice Smart of 16 July 2009 and 29 July 2009 be stayed until further order of the Court. ….. 4. That the parties be relieved of compliance with the UCPR regarding the application for leave to cross-appeal and in lieu thereof: DECISION: a) ..... b) the respondent include the applicants' cross-summons for leave to cross-appeal and draft notice of cross-appeal in the Red Book; c) the applicants file and serve their Summary of Argument within 21 days of service of the Red, Blue and Black Books by the respondent; d) the respondent file and serve his Response within 21 days of service of the applicants' Summary of Argument; e) thereafter, the cross-summons for leave to cross-appeal be heard concurrently with the Appeal filed 29 October 2009 [.....] utilising the Red, Blue and Black Books in lieu of the White Folder.] I order that the costs of this motion be costs in the application for leave to cross-appeal and the cross-appeal, if leave is granted or found to be unnecessary.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate