NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Albert James PADDOCK [2009] NSWSC 369
HEARING DATE(S) : 24 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 May 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Rothman J
DECISION : Sentenced to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 4 years and 3 months commencing 23 May 2007 and expiring on 22 August 2011, the balance of term being 1 year and 9 months expiring on 22 May 2013; eligible for release on 22 August 2011.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – indictment for murder, plea of guilty to manslaughter on the basis of substantial impairment – crown accepted in full satisfaction of indictment – sentence imposed
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY : Sentence
Berrier v R [2009] NSWCCA 40 R v Antaky [2007] NSWSC 1047 R v Blacklidge (Court of Criminal Appeal, 12 December 1995, unreported) R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Ferguson [2008] NSWSC 761 R v Hawkins [2001] NSWSC 420 R v Hill (1981) 3 A Crim R 397 CASES CITED : R v Jones (1993) 70 A Crim R 449 R v Keceski (Court of Criminal Appeal, 10 August 1993, unreported) R v Keir [2004] NSWCCA 106 R v Thomson and Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Vachalec (1981) NSWLR 351 Regina v Connolly [2001] NSWSC 787 Regina v Mabbott [2002] NSWSC 502 Salah v R [2009] NSWCCA 2 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465
PARTIES : Regina (Crown) Albert James Paddock (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate