NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: WILLIAMS v BLACKLEY [2010] NSWCA 246
HEARING DATE(S): 17 September 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 September 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1, 14; Campbell JA at 13, 17
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 17 September 2010
(1) In each matter, refuse leave to appeal. DECISION: (2) Order the applicant to pay the respondent Mr Blackley's reasonable expenses incurred in responding to the application in this Court, including any loss of wages in attending today's hearing. (3) No order as to the costs of Mr Van Kooten.
CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - not available to quash acquittal in criminal proceedings - COSTS - general rule that costs follow the event - self-represented respondent - payment of reasonable expenses including lost wages
Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW). ss 23, 56 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 150 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Director of Public Prosecutions v Humphrys [1977] AC 1 Carlton v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 244; 189 A Crim R 332 CASES CITED: DJL v Central Authority [2000] HCA 17; 201 CLR 226 Ex parte Schofield; Re Austin (1953) 53 SR(NSW) 163 R v El-Zarw [1994] 2 Qd R 67 R v Wolverhampton Crown Court; Ex parte Crofts [1983] 1 WLR 204
TEXTS CITED: Aronson, Dyer and Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (4th ed, 2009) at [5.220]
Colin Bruce Williams - Applicant PARTIES: Terry Arnold Blackley - First Respondent Andrew Henry Van Kooten - Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate