NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Jandsen Pty Ltd v Welsh [2009] NSWCA 33
HEARING DATE(S): 9 February 2009 JUDGMENT OF: McColl JA at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 9 February 2009
DECISION: 1. Upon the applicant undertaking to prosecute the application for special leave to appeal with due diligence, the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 3 December 2008 is stayed pending disposition of the application for special leave to appeal and, if that application be successful, pending disposition by the High Court of the appeal. 2. Costs of the notice of motion be costs in the cause.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE – application for stay pending application for special leave
CATEGORY: Procedural and other rulings
Jandson Pty Ltd v Welsh [2008] NSWCA 317 CASES CITED: Sibuse Pty Ltd v Shaw (No 2) (1988) 13 NSWLR 125 TCN Channel 0 Pty Ltd v Antoniadis (No 2) (1999) 48 NSWLR 381
PARTIES: Jandson Pty Ltd - Applicant Judith Carol Welsh -Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40077 of 2008
D A Priestly for the Applicant COUNSEL: M M Fraser for the Respondent
SOLICITORS: Thompson Cooper Lawyers for the Applicant Brydens Compensation Lawyers for the Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Court of Appeal
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40077/08
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Giles JA, MAcfarlan JA, Hammerschlag J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 3 December 2008
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2008] NSWCA 317
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40077/08
McCOLL JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate