NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: HUTCHISON v R [2010] NSWCCA 122
HEARING DATE(S): 22 February 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 June 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hulme J at 3; Latham J at 10
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against stentence - guilty plea to manslaughter - whether Judge overstated severity of applicant's criminal history and took it into account as an aggravating factor - whether error in the assessment of the applicant's prospects of rehabilitation - whether sentence manifestly excessive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Veen v the Queen (No. 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 R v McNaughton (2006) 163 A Crim R 381 Tidona v R [2005] NSWCCA 410 R v Aboud [2005] NSWCCA 251 R v Groat [2001] NSWCCA 452 R v Fernando [2002] NSWCCA 28 R v Thomson ; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309 ; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Mulato [2006] NSWCCA 282 CASES CITED : R v Forbes [2005] NSWCCA 377 ; 160 A Crim R 1 R v Troja NSWCCA 16 July 1991 R v Morabito (1992) 62 A Crim R 82 R v Maguire NSWCCA 30 August 1995 R v Forbes [2005] NSWCCA 377 R v Hopley [2008] NSWCCA 105 R v Irvine [2008] NSWCCA 273 R v Greenhalgh [2001] NSWCCA 437 R v Hamilton [2007] NSWSC 452
PARTIES: Nathan George Hutchison - Applicant Regina - Crown Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/20725
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate