NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: State of New South Wales v Gebethner [2009] NSWCA 237
HEARING DATE(S): 29/07/2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 14, 16; Macfarlan JA at 15; Handley AJA at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 29 July 2009
1. That leave to appeal be granted, DECISION: 2. That filing of a notice of appeal and further compliance with the rules be dispensed with, 3. That the appeal be allowed with costs, and 4. That the order as to costs in the District Court be set aside and that there be substituted an order that the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings in the District Court on the ordinary basis.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS - discontinuance - plaintiff unable to meet damages threshold - defendant prima facie entitled to costs of action.
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act, s 26C Suitors' Fund Act.
CASES CITED: House v The King 55 CLR 499
PARTIES: State of New South Wales - Applicant Ben Gebethner - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40062/2009
COUNSEL: S Norton SC and G Mahony - Applicant Respondent in Person
SOLICITORS: I V Knight Crown Solicitor - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 383/06 (Newcastle)
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Tonner SC, DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 10.12.08
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40062/09
GILES JA MACFARLAN JA HANDLEY AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate